7 Forgotten Wars That Are Secretly Driving Global Power Politics

Wars

Sudan, Congo, Myanmar, the Sahel, Yemen, the Horn of Africa and Haiti are not footnotes. They are where Russia, China, the United States and the Gulf states are competing right now.

The seven forgotten wars shaping global power politics in 2026 are Sudan’s civil war, the M23 war in eastern Congo, Myanmar’s civil war, the jihadist war in the Sahel, Yemen’s Red Sea war, the Ethiopia–Eritrea–Tigray standoff, and Haiti’s gang war. They get far less airtime than Iran or Ukraine, yet each sits on a shipping chokepoint, a critical-mineral supply chain or a great-power rivalry. That is why Russia, China, the United States, the Gulf states and Turkey keep turning up in them.

Pick up your phone. Somewhere inside it, a tiny capacitor may hold tantalum, and tantalum comes from coltan. About one kilogram in every seven of the world’s coltan is dug out of a single mining district in eastern Congo called Rubaya, a place most people could not find on a map.

Now think of the electric car humming past your window. Its motor depends on heavy rare earths, and nearly half of the world’s supply is mined in Kachin State in northern Myanmar, around Bhamo, less than a hundred kilometres from the Chinese border. Think of the crude oil that leaves Saudi Arabia’s Red Sea port of Yanbu. It now sails past a coastline that a rebel movement seized in September.

None of those places led the news today. Several have not led it in months. Yet each is a war, and each is quietly deciding who controls a supply chain, a sea lane or an alliance. The cameras left. The great powers did not.

This is a guide to seven of those wars: what is happening on the ground as of 2 October 2026, who is really fighting them, and why each one matters far beyond its borders.

Why “Forgotten” Is The Wrong Word For These Wars

The UN refugee agency counted 117.8 million forcibly displaced people at the end of 2025, about one in every 70 humans. That figure fell for the first time in a decade, partly because millions went home to Syria, Afghanistan and Sudan, often in dire conditions. The relief did not last. When the US-Israeli war on Iran began on 28 February 2026, Iran effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz, and the world’s attention locked onto the Gulf.

Attention is the scarcest resource in international politics, and it flows to a few wars at a time. The wars outside that spotlight do not stop. They become cheaper places to compete. A government can back a proxy in Darfur, rent mercenaries in Mali or sell weapons to a junta in Myanmar and rarely pay a diplomatic price at home. A war can be forgotten by audiences and still be closely watched by capitals.

To pick the seven below, I used four tests. The war must be active, or openly on the brink, as of 2 October 2026. It must get little sustained coverage compared with its scale. At least two outside powers must have a documented stake. And it must connect to a chokepoint, a critical commodity or a security alliance that reaches past its region.

Also Read – Strait of Hormuz: The Critical Path to Peace…

Map: Seven wars, One Connected system

7 Wars on Map

Where the seven wars sit:

  1. Sudan (north-east Africa): Army v. RSF. The UAE, Egypt, Turkey and Russia all have a stake, and the prize includes the Red Sea coast.
  2. Eastern Congo (central Africa): Rwanda-backed M23 v. Kinshasa, with the US trading minerals for security and China holding the mines.
  3. Myanmar (South-East Asia): Junta v. ethnic armies over the heavy rare earths that feed China’s magnet industry.
  4. Sahel (West Africa): Jihadists besiege Bamako while Russia’s Africa Corps loses ground.
  5. Yemen and the Red Sea (Arabian Peninsula): Houthis now hold Yemen’s whole Red Sea coast and are blockading Saudi Arabia.
  6. Horn of Africa (Ethiopia, Eritrea, Tigray): Ethiopia wants a port, Eritrea fears invasion, and Tigray is the fuse.
  7. Haiti (Caribbean): Gangs hold most of Port-au-Prince while a US-backed UN force fights to keep its mandate.

Not on the list, because the world is already watching it: the Strait of Hormuz and the Iran war.

1. Sudan’s war: two generals and a Red Sea prize

Since April 2023 · North-east Africa

Sudan’s war began when the army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), once allies, fell out over folding the paramilitary into the regular military. The turning point came on 26–27 October 2025, when the RSF took El Fasher, the army’s last stronghold in Darfur, amid reports of mass killings. In 2026 the fighting moved east into Kordofan. On 26 July the army retook Bara, Jabra al-Sheikh and Umm Sayala on the road linking Omdurman to El-Obeid, and its chief of staff promised to finish the RSF before the end of the year.

Sudan

The RSF answered with coordinated drone strikes on five army-held cities and, in August, a push into Kurmuk on the Ethiopian border, according to Al Jazeera. Aid workers estimate that more than 200,000 people have been killed. Depending on the count, between 13 and 15 million have been forced from their homes.

Also Read – Two Years On, Sudan’s War is Spreading

The outside world is deeply involved. The United Arab Emirates is widely accused of arming the RSF and denies it. Egypt and Turkey back the government, according to The New Arab. Russia first leaned toward the RSF. Sudan’s government has since reportedly offered Moscow a 25-year naval base at Port Sudan, for up to four ships and 300 personnel, in exchange for arms, and Washington has warned of serious consequences. A US-backed truce plan from the Quad (the US, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Egypt) was rejected by the army chief, who called the group biased because the UAE sits in it.

A Russian base at Port Sudan would let Moscow watch traffic entering and leaving the Suez Canal. Sudan is where Gulf rivalry, Russia’s hunt for a warm-water foothold and US efforts to keep the Red Sea open collide, and gold helps pay for the fighting. Investigators at The Sentry describe an RSF business empire spanning gold, livestock and banking.

2. The Congo war: minerals for peace, tested in real time

Since 2022 (and 30 years before) · Central Africa

The Rwanda-backed M23 movement seized Goma and Bukavu in early 2025, and it is the most prominent of more than 100 armed groups in Congo’s mineral-rich east. About seven million Congolese are displaced. What makes this war unusual is the thick diplomacy wrapped around it. The Washington Accords between Congo and Rwanda came in December 2025.

A Doha framework between Kinshasa and M23 came in November, and a ceasefire has been in place since 15 November, though fighting goes on. In August 2026, talks in Switzerland, mediated by the US, Qatar, Togo, Switzerland and the African Union, produced a roadmap, and a first ceasefire verification mission was sent to Minembwe in South Kivu, where militias allied to each side have been fighting.

Congo

Washington is playing two hands. It signed a strategic partnership with Kinshasa in December 2025 to secure cobalt, copper and lithium, reducing dependence on Chinese supply chains. It also sanctioned the entire Rwanda Defence Force on 2 March 2026, and in June it targeted M23 and FDLR commanders and a Kigali network moving gold. Yet the US exempted Rwandan operations in Mozambique’s Cabo Delgado from its sanctions, because Rwandan troops are fighting insurgents there, as the FDD notes. Even sanctions have exceptions when a war overlaps with another.

Also Read- Minerals for peace – or war over minerals in the DR Congo?

Rubaya’s mines produce roughly 15 percent of the world’s coltan, per Global Witness, and the rebels have reportedly even sought to sell directly to the United States. Meanwhile China’s CMOC, the world’s largest cobalt miner, posted record output in 2025, and Beijing controls roughly 70 percent of global cobalt refining.

Congo is the live test of “minerals-for-security” diplomacy. If it works, it becomes a template for resource-rich fragile states. If it fails, it shows that sanctions and deals cannot outweigh a rebel group that profits from the war.

3. Myanmar’s war: the rare-earth front line

Since February 2021 · South-East Asia

Since the 2021 coup, Myanmar’s military has lost control of most border regions to ethnic armies and resistance forces. It held an election in December 2025 and January 2026 that critics call a sham to legitimise military rule. In May 2026 the junta, under a new military chief, launched fresh offensives in Kachin, Chin and Karen states, aimed at rare-earth areas and trade routes toward India and Thailand. Air power does the heavy lifting, and Reuters has reported that the bombing campaign relied on illicit jet-fuel deliveries, including from Iran.

Myanmar

The prize is geological. Between 2017 and 2024, Myanmar exported more than 290,000 tonnes of rare-earth material to China, worth over $4.2 billion. Reuters has reported that nearly half of the world’s heavy rare earths come from Kachin, near Bhamo, where the Kachin Independence Army has fought the junta for the town. Those elements become magnets for electric vehicles and wind turbines, and China dominates their refining.

Also Read – The Critical Minerals Linking Myanmar’s Civil War to the World

Beijing’s position is subtle. It sees the junta as a guarantor of its economic interests, yet it also talks to the rebels, because what it wants most is steady shipments. When fighting threatens the flow, China uses its leverage on both sides. The UN counted more than 3.5 million displaced inside Myanmar early in 2025, and 1.2 million Rohingya shelter in Bangladesh, per UNHCR.

Western plans to loosen China’s grip on rare earths run straight through a war zone where Beijing holds the strongest hand. Whoever controls Kachin’s mines influences the price of the clean-energy transition.

4. The Sahel war: Russia’s African gamble under siege

Since 2012, escalating since 2025 · West Africa

From September 2025, the al-Qaeda-linked JNIM attacked fuel convoys heading for Bamako, hitting more than 130 tankers and, by Just Security’s account, forcing school closures across Mali. On 25 April 2026, JNIM and the Tuareg-led Azawad Liberation Front struck across the country at once. A suicide truck bomb killed Defence Minister Sadio Camara near the capital, the rebels took Kidal, and Russia’s Africa Corps accepted an escorted withdrawal from the city and from other northern bases.

Sahel

For Moscow the setback hurt. The Africa Corps replaced the Wagner Group in Mali, and the juntas of Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger had pushed out France and, in Mali’s case, UN peacekeepers to partner with Russia. ACLED data cited by Just Security show battles involving Russian fighters in Mali fell from 537 in 2024 to 402 in 2025, and the Africa Corps now looks more like a regime-protection force than a combat one. The war in Ukraine has also stretched Russian manpower. Even so, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov flew to Niamey on 8 July 2026 and promised the juntas Moscow would not walk away.

Also Read – Violent Extremism in the Sahel

Money keeps the insurgents going. The International Crisis Group noted an estimated $50 million ransom allegedly paid for two abducted Emiratis, which left JNIM unusually flush. It also warned that both Mali and Burkina Faso face a growing risk of regime collapse. Spillover is already creeping toward coastal states such as Benin and Togo.

The Sahel is the test of Russia’s whole Africa model: regime protection in exchange for access and influence. If Bamako buckles, the post-French order in West Africa buckles with it, and Washington’s cheap intelligence flights start to look like a hedge worth making.

5. Yemen’s Red Sea war: a rebel movement at the world’s choke point

Since 2014 · Arabian Peninsula

Yemen’s war entered a dangerous phase in 2026. In July the Iran-backed Houthis declared a naval blockade of Saudi Arabia, and in mid-September they seized the port of Mokha, nearby islands and the Bab al-Mandeb coastline, giving them Yemen’s entire Red Sea shore. Their top diplomat insists navigation remains open, while traffic through the strait has fallen.

Yemen

The timing matters. With Hormuz disrupted by the Iran war, Saudi Arabia has pushed more crude through its East-West pipeline to Yanbu on the Red Sea. Lloyd’s List Intelligence found that Bab al-Mandeb traffic dropped 24 percent after the blockade, while very large crude carriers rerouted via Suez, lightening cargo at Yanbu or discharging partly at Ain Sukhna to fit the canal’s draught limits. The Red Sea carries roughly 12 to 15 percent of global maritime trade and about 30 percent of container traffic, according to industry analysts.

Also Read – Yemen government forces widen attacks against Houthis

On the ground, the human toll is staggering. The UN says 22.3 million Yemenis need aid in 2026, including 5.2 million internally displaced, and the response plan was only about 13 percent funded at last report.

A rebel movement, armed and encouraged by Iran, now holds leverage over the two energy corridors the world depends on. It does not need a full blockade. As one former US admiral put it, the bar for the Houthis to succeed is low.

6. The Ethiopia–Eritrea war that has not quite started

Building since 2024 · Horn of Africa

This is the one war on the list that may still be avoided. Ethiopia’s prime minister, Abiy Ahmed, calls sea access a matter of survival for his landlocked country, and he has eyed the Eritrean port of Assab, only about 60 kilometres from the border. The International Crisis Group called the region a powder keg in February 2026.

Ethiopia

Signals have since darkened. Fighting between Tigrayan forces and federal troops broke out on 29 January, Ethiopia accused Eritrea of occupying its territory and backing armed groups, and diplomats reported troop deployments in May. In August, clashes with heavy artillery and drones erupted near the Sudanese border. Sudan Tribune reported 15 Tigrayan bodies recovered from the Setit River, and Tigrayan forces accused the government of a drone strike.

Also Read – Ethiopia-Eritrea, an absurd war

Analysts disagree on what comes next. ACLED argues that a direct state-versus-state war is unlikely and that the likelier outcome is each side backing the other’s rebels. Either way, the 1998–2000 border war killed tens of thousands, and the region’s hotspots are now wired together. The Ethiopia–Sudan frontier is also where the RSF pushed on Kurmuk in August.

Whoever fights for Assab is fighting for a spot on the Red Sea, the same corridor that Yemen’s war and Sudan’s war already threaten. One regional expert warned that proxies would be pulled in quickly if war erupts.

7. Haiti’s gang war: a UN force with a US fingerprint

Since 2021 · Caribbean

Gangs control an estimated 90 percent of Port-au-Prince, and the UN recorded more than 5,500 killed across Haiti between March 2025 and mid-January 2026, with over 1.4 million displaced. The Security Council responded on 30 September 2025 by authorising a Gang Suppression Force of up to 5,550, proposed by the United States and Panama. The vote was 12 in favour, with Russia, China and Pakistan abstaining. Unlike its Kenyan-led predecessor, the force can make arrests.

Haiti

Chad’s troops arrived in April 2026, and in mid-June Secretary-General António Guterres visited the force’s headquarters. On 29 September 2026 the Council extended the force’s mandate by six months, to 31 March 2027, with China, Russia and Pakistan abstaining again. The force is at roughly 30 percent of its planned strength, with about 1,500 troops deployed and around 4,000 more expected in the coming months. Haiti is also preparing for its first elections in a decade, with a first round planned for 13 December.

Also Read- UN Security Council extends Haiti anti-gang force by 6 months

Russia’s ambassador argued that the mandate allows force against anyone labelled with the vague term “gangs”. That sums up the fault line: Western capitals frame the problem as organised violence to be suppressed, while Moscow and Beijing question the precedent.

Haiti is Washington’s backyard, and it shows a new model of international security: a hybrid force run by willing countries, with UN logistics, rather than a classic blue-helmet mission. If it works, expect copies.

The Scoreboard: Who Pays, And What Is The Prize?

The human cost is concentrated where the strategic prizes are. The chart shows the scale of internal displacement in five of the seven wars with solid published figures. The Sahel and Horn wars are not charted, because comparable counts were not available at the time of writing.

People displaced, five of the seven wars

WarPeople displacedSource note
Sudan13–15 millionUN estimates range from about 13 to 15 million
Congo7 millionDisplaced in Congo, per the UN as reported by AP
Yemen5.2 millionInternally displaced, UN OCHA 2026 plan
Myanmar3.5 million+UN estimate cited in early 2025, likely higher now
Haiti1.4 millionDisplaced by gang violence, per UN figures reported by AP

Counting methods differ between agencies and some numbers are older than others. For scale, UNHCR counted 117.8 million forcibly displaced people worldwide at the end of 2025.

The table below reverses the question and asks what each war really controls.

The Prize In Each War

WarWhat is really at stakeOutside players
1. SudanGold networks and the Red Sea coast, including a possible Russian base at Port SudanUAE, Egypt, Turkey, Russia, US
2. Eastern CongoCobalt, coltan, copper and lithium. Rubaya alone supplies about 15% of the world’s coltanUS, Rwanda, China, Qatar
3. MyanmarHeavy rare earths in Kachin, near the Chinese borderChina, Iran (jet fuel), India and Thailand (border trade)
4. SahelFuel routes into Bamako and the credibility of Russia’s Africa CorpsRussia, Algeria, US
5. Yemen and the Red SeaBab al-Mandeb, Suez access and Saudi crude exports from YanbuIran, Saudi Arabia, US, Egypt
6. Ethiopia and EritreaThe port of Assab and Ethiopia’s access to the seaEritrea, Ethiopia, Tigray, Sudan border
7. HaitiA US-led security model and the Security Council’s credibilityUS, Panama, Chad; Russia and China abstained

Five Rules These Wars Share

1. The attention map is not the interest map. A war can drop out of the headlines while its strategic value climbs. Port Sudan, Bab al-Mandeb and Kachin are more important to great powers today than they were when the cameras were present.

2. Chokepoints and minerals turn local wars into global ones. Cobalt, coltan, rare earths, Suez-bound crude and Red Sea ports give distant governments a reason to care. Where there is no resource or sea lane, as in parts of Haiti, attention fades faster.

3. Outside powers rent wars rather than fight them. Drones, mercenary brands and arms-for-access deals let states shape outcomes cheaply. Sudan’s drone war, Russia’s Africa Corps and the Houthis’ reach with Iranian backing are all versions of the same trick.

4. Peace has become transactional and crowded. Congo has Washington, Doha and Geneva tracks. Sudan has a Quad that its own army calls biased. Parties can shop for the forum that suits them, and deals are tied to minerals, sanctions relief or access.

5. Wars talk to each other. Sudan’s RSF pushes toward Ethiopia’s border, Ethiopia eyes Eritrea’s coast, the Houthis tighten the Red Sea, and Russia’s stretched forces in Mali are shaped by the war in Ukraine. Treating each conflict as a silo misses the system.

FAQs…

What are the biggest forgotten wars in 2026?

Sudan, eastern Congo, Myanmar, the Sahel, Yemen and the Red Sea, the Ethiopia–Eritrea–Tigray standoff and Haiti. They differ in scale, but all are active or near active and attract little sustained coverage compared with the Iran and Ukraine wars.

Why do forgotten wars matter for geopolitics?

They happen on supply chains, sea lanes and alliance fault lines. Outside powers use them to gain bases, minerals and influence at a low political cost, and spillover can reach shipping, energy prices and technology markets.

Which forgotten war affects the global economy most?

Yemen’s Red Sea war has the most direct effect on trade and energy, since the Red Sea carries about 12 to 15 percent of global maritime trade. Myanmar and Congo shape rare-earth and cobalt supply for electric vehicles and electronics.

Which outside powers are involved?

Russia, China, the United States, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt, Iran and Rwanda each have documented roles in at least one of these wars, as supporters, mediators, arms suppliers or trading partners.

How can I follow these wars reliably?

Use primary trackers such as UNHCR and UN OCHA for humanitarian data, ACLED for conflict events, Crisis Group for analysis, and Lloyd’s List Intelligence for Red Sea shipping, then compare regional and international reporting.

What To Watch Between Now And The End of 2026

Sudan’s army has promised to finish the RSF by December, so watch Kordofan and the Blue Nile border. In Haiti, watch how fast troops arrive, since the force is at about 30 percent strength, and the run-up to the 13 December vote. In Congo, the question is whether the Geneva roadmap turns into a real withdrawal and a verified ceasefire. In the Red Sea, watch whether the Houthis follow through on threats to extend attacks to the northern Red Sea and Suez. In the Horn, watch the Tigray–Ethiopia clashes near Sudan. In the Sahel, watch the siege of Bamako. And in Myanmar, watch the junta’s push toward Kachin’s rare-earth belt.

Love to hear your opinion…

FREE

Get it free 🎁

A monthly briefing on Geopolitics, Geoeconomy, and International Relations — no fluff

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime

FREE

Get it free 🎁

A monthly briefing on Geopolitics, Geoeconomy, and International Relations — no fluff

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime

administrator
Srittam is an analyst and researcher specializing in global power dynamics, international relations, and the political economy of conflict. His work traces how great-power rivalry, strategic alliances, energy security, and trade policy converge to reshape the international order — from shifting military balances to the economic statecraft driving today's realignments.Srittam's analysis moves beyond headlines to map the underlying structures of power: why states act as they do, how markets respond to geopolitical risk, and what these shifts mean for governments, businesses, and ordinary citizens navigating an increasingly contested world. His approach pairs rigorous, evidence-based research with a clarity of writing that makes complex global developments accessible without oversimplifying them.He writes at the intersection of strategy and consequence — connecting the dots between diplomatic maneuvering, economic policy, and the everyday realities they produce.Contact: analysis@strategicworld360.com

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    ×

    Login to your account

    Don't have an account? Sign up

    ✉
    🔒